Interpreting significance of interactions June 19th, 2013, 6:16pm
Home Calendar Search Register Login
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot password? Please Create a new Account

Rasch Measurement Forum    General Boards    Rasch on the run ...  ›  Interpreting significance of interactions
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 4 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    Interpreting significance of interactions  (currently 982 views)
windy
Posted: August 4th, 2012, 2:48pm Report to Moderator
Baby Member


Posts: 7
Dear Rasch-stars,

I performed an interaction analysis using Facets and I am interested in determining whether rater severity interacts with item type. Based on my understanding of the interactions in Facets, the t-statistics are testing the null hypothesis that a rater's severity on a certain type of item is not significantly different than the overall rater severity on that type of item.

However,when I'm looking at t-tests for 15 raters on these two types of items, it seems like it might be appropriate to do a post-hoc adjustment for the t-statistics in order to avoid Type II error. Would a Bonferroni adjustment be appropriate?

Thanks!
Stefanie
Logged Offline
Mike.Linacre
Posted: August 5th, 2012, 6:38am Report to Moderator
Maximum Member


Posts: 812
Stefanie: a Bonferroni adjustment is appropriate if your hypothesis is "These raters are unbiased." No adjustment is needed if your hypothesis is "This rater is unbiased." And, of course, we choose the hypothesis before looking at the results of the statistical tests.
Logged Offline
Reply: 1 - 1
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Rasch on the run ...  [ previous | next ] Switch to: Rasch on the run ... (only location)

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is off
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on

Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006