Global fit statistics 
Please use Table 44. This uses simulations to estimate the degrees of freedom.
Here is an earlier computation of degrees of freedom which tended to exaggerate misfit of the data to the Rasch model:
Winsteps reports global fit statistics and approximate global loglikelihood chisquare (or chisquared†) statistic in Table 3.1. The usual significance levels are p≤.05 and p≤.01.
Example: To compare the fit of "Rating Scale Model" (RSM) and "Partial Credit Model" (PCM, ISGROUPS=0) analyses. The number of categories and items is in the Table heading. The chisquare test is:
(global chisquare for RSM analysis  global chisquare for PCM analysis) with d.f. (PCM Categories  2*Items  RSM categories+2)
The variance tables report the relative sizes of explained and unexplained variances.
The chisquare value is approximate. It is based on the current reported estimates which may depart noticeably from the "true" maximum likelihood estimates for these data. The degrees of freedom are the number of datapoints used in the free estimation (i.e., excluding missing data, data in extreme scores, etc.) less the number of free parameters.
For an unanchored analysis, free parameters = nonextreme items + nonextreme persons  1 + (categories in estimated ratingscale structures  2 * ratingscale structures).
Thus, for the "Liking for Science" data of 75 children administered 25 items. There are 74 nonextreme children and 25 nonextreme items. The data are complete so there are 74 x 25 = 1850 data points. The free parameters are 74 + 25  1 + (3category rating scale  2 x 1 rating scale) = 99 parameters. So the degrees of freedom are 1850  99 = 1751. The loglikelihood chisquare is 2657.91. So that the significance p=.000, i.e., the data exhibit highly significant misfit to the Rasch model, as is nearly always expected.
If you wish to compute your own global (or any other) fit test, the responselevel probabilities, residuals etc. are reported in the XFILE=. For instance, for a global fit test, you could add up all the logprobabilities. Then chisquare estimate =  2 * logprobability. A different chisquare estimate is the sum of squaredstandardized residuals. You can count up the number of free parameters. For complete dichotomous data, it is usually the minimum of (number of different person marginal raw scores, number of different item marginal scores)  1.
For a more local fit test, the chisquare estimate is 2 * sum of logprobabilities of relevant data or sum of squaredstandardized residuals for the relevant data. The degrees of freedom approximate the count of data points less L'/L for each relevant person parameter and N'/N for each relevant item parameter, where L' is the number of responses by the person included in the local test and L is the total number of responses by the person. N' is the number of responses to the item included in the local test and N is the total number of responses to the item.
Deviance statistics are more trustworthy. They are the difference between the chisquares of two analyses, with d.f. of the difference between the number of free parameters estimated.
The Rasch model is an idealization, never achieved by real data. Accordingly, given enough data, we expect to see statistically significant misfit the model. If the current data do not misfit, we merely have to collect more data, and they will! In essence, the null hypothesis of this significance test is the wrong one! We learn nothing from testing the hypothesis, "Do the data fit the model (perfectly)?" Or, as usually expressed in social science, "Does the model fit the data (perfectly)?" Perfection is never obtained in empirical data. What we really want to test is the hypothesis "Do the data fit the model usefully?" And, if not, where is the misfit, and what is it? Is it big enough in size (not "statistical significance") to cause trouble? This is the approach used in much of industrial qualitycontrol, and also in Winsteps.
The general principle for degrees of freedom is "number of data points used for estimating the parameters  number of free parameters estimated". So, in most Rasch situations, when computing the d.f.:
1. omit extreme scores (persons and items).
2. data points = number of datapoints in nonextreme scores.
3. number of free person parameters = number of persons
4. number of free item parameters = number of items  1, because the items are usually centered at 0 so one parameter is constrained to be the negative of the sum of the other parameters.
5. number of free parameters for each rating scale structure = number of categories in the structure  2.
6. So dichotomies have no free parameters
"Rating scale model" = one structure for all the data
"Partial credit model" = one structure per item
Groupeditem model" = one structure per itemgroup.
However, this formulabased computation tends to exaggerate misfit of the data to the Rasch model. This , is superseded by the simulation method in Table 44.
† chisquared is the technically correct term (Karl Pearson, 1900), but chisquare is more widely used.
Help for Winsteps Rasch Measurement Software: www.winsteps.com. Author: John Michael Linacre
For more information, contact info@winsteps.com or use the Contact Form
Facets Rasch measurement software.
Buy for $149. & site licenses.
Freeware student/evaluation download Winsteps Rasch measurement software. Buy for $149. & site licenses. Freeware student/evaluation download 

Stateoftheart : singleuser and site licenses : free student/evaluation versions : download immediately : instructional PDFs : user forum : assistance by email : bugs fixed fast : free update eligibility : backwards compatible : money back if not satisfied Rasch, Winsteps, Facets online Tutorials 

Forum  Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Raschrelated topic 
Click here to add your email address to the Winsteps and Facets email list for notifications.
Click here to ask a question or make a suggestion about Winsteps and Facets software.
Coming Raschrelated Events  

Oct. 2527, 2017, Wed.Fri.  Inperson workshop: Applying the Rasch Model handson introductory workshop, Melbourne, Australia (T. Bond, B&FSteps), Announcement 
Dec. 68, 2017, Wed.Fri.  Inperson workshop: Introductory Rasch Analysis using RUMM2030, Leeds, UK (M. Horton), Announcement 
Jan. 5  Feb. 2, 2018, Fri.Fri.  Online workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement  Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com 
Jan. 1016, 2018, Wed.Tues.  Inperson workshop: Advanced Course in Rasch Measurement Theory and the application of RUMM2030, Perth, Australia (D. Andrich), Announcement 
Jan. 1719, 2018, Wed.Fri.  Rasch Conference: Seventh International Conference on Probabilistic Models for Measurement, Matilda Bay Club, Perth, Australia, Website 
Jan. 2224, 2018, MonWed.  Inperson workshop: Rasch Measurement for Everybody (A. Tristan, Winsteps), San Luis Potosi, Mexico. www.ieia.com.mx 
April 1012, 2018, Tues.Thurs.  Rasch Conference: IOMW, New York, NY, www.iomw.org 
April 1317, 2018, Fri.Tues.  AERA, New York, NY, www.aera.net 
May 25  June 22, 2018, Fri.Fri.  Online workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement  Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com 
June 29  July 27, 2018, Fri.Fri.  Online workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement  Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com 
Aug. 10  Sept. 7, 2018, Fri.Fri.  Online workshop: ManyFacet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com 
Oct. 12  Nov. 9, 2018, Fri.Fri.  Online workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement  Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com 
Our current URL is www.winsteps.com
Winsteps^{®} is a registered trademark