Anchored estimation

How many anchor items or anchor persons?


The percent of anchor items is less important than the number of anchor items. We need enough anchor items to be statistically certain that a large incorrect value of one anchor item will not distort the equating. In my experiments, 10 were needed in order to prevent large accidental deviation in one from distorting the measurement. Please remember that the choice of 10 anchor items is before cleaning. We expect the 10 anchor items to malfunction somewhat. If we did not, only one anchor item would be needed.


Suppose that we have 10 anchor items. Then we discover one anchor item has changed its difficulty in the new test administration. In our analysis of the new test administration, we unanchor that item, so that there now only 9 anchor items. Have we failed the 10-anchor-item criterion? No! The remaining 9 anchor items are now better than the original 10 anchor items.



Anchoring or fixing parameter estimates (measures) is done with IAFILE= for items, PAFILE= for persons, and SAFILE= for response structures.


From the estimation perspective under JMLE, anchored and unanchored items appear exactly alike. The only difference is that anchored values are not changed at the end of each estimation iteration, but unanchored estimates are. JMLE converges when "observed raw score = expected raw score based on the estimates". For anchored values, this convergence criterion is never met, but the fit statistics etc. are computed and reported by Winsteps as though the anchor value is the "true" parameter value. Convergence of the overall analysis is based on the unanchored estimates. if large displacements are shown for the anchored items or persons, try changing the setting of ANCESTIM=.


Using pre-set "anchor" values to fix the measures of items (or persons) in order to equate the results of the current analysis to those of other analyses is a form of "common item" (or "common person") equating. Unlike common-item equating methods in which all datasets contribute to determining the difficulties of the linking items, the current anchored dataset has no influence on those values. Typically, the use of anchored items (or persons) does not require the computation of equating or linking constants. During an anchored analysis, the person measures are computed from the anchored item values. Those person measures are used to compute item difficulties for all non-anchored items. Then all non-anchored item and person measures are fine-tuned until the best possible overall set of measures is obtained. Discrepancies between the anchor values and the values that would have been estimated from the current data can be reported as displacements. The standard errors associated with the displacements can be used to compute approximate t-statistics to test the hypothesis that the displacements are merely due to measurement error.



Example: I have a study in which an instrument is administered serially over time to each participant.  I want to estimate the trait for subsequent occasions treating the baseline parameter estimates as fixed.


Here's an approach:

1.Format the so that each data row is a set of 7 items followed by a person label containing a time-point code (say, 01,02,03,04,..) in the first two columns and a participant number.

2.Analyze each time-point in a separate file or separately in a combined file using PSELECT=01 then  PSELECT=02, etc. to verify that the data for each time-point is correctly entered.

3.Analyze the time-point 01 file or separately in a combined file using PSELECT=01. Output IFILE=01if.txt SFILE=01sf.txt

4.Analyze all the data in separate files or combined files with no PSELECT= and IAFILE=01if.txt SAFILE=01sf.txt
Output PFILE= filename.txt or PFILE=filename.xls containing a measure for every time-point + participant using the time-point 01 parameter values.

Help for Winsteps Rasch Measurement Software: Author: John Michael Linacre

For more information, contact or use the Contact Form

Facets Rasch measurement software. Buy for $149. & site licenses. Freeware student/evaluation download
Winsteps Rasch measurement software. Buy for $149. & site licenses. Freeware student/evaluation download

State-of-the-art : single-user and site licenses : free student/evaluation versions : download immediately : instructional PDFs : user forum : assistance by email : bugs fixed fast : free update eligibility : backwards compatible : money back if not satisfied
Rasch, Winsteps, Facets online Tutorials


Forum Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic

Click here to add your email address to the Winsteps and Facets email list for notifications.

Click here to ask a question or make a suggestion about Winsteps and Facets software.

Rasch Publications
Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online) Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox Best Test Design, Wright & Stone
Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales: Rasch Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments, George Engelhard, Jr. & Stefanie Wind Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green
Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar Journal of Applied Measurement Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale
in Spanish: Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez
Winsteps Tutorials Facets Tutorials Rasch Discussion Groups



Coming Rasch-related Events
Jan. 5 - Feb. 2, 2018, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),
Jan. 10-16, 2018, Wed.-Tues. In-person workshop: Advanced Course in Rasch Measurement Theory and the application of RUMM2030, Perth, Australia (D. Andrich), Announcement
Jan. 17-19, 2018, Wed.-Fri. Rasch Conference: Seventh International Conference on Probabilistic Models for Measurement, Matilda Bay Club, Perth, Australia, Website
Jan. 22-24, 2018, Mon-Wed. In-person workshop: Rasch Measurement for Everybody en español (A. Tristan, Winsteps), San Luis Potosi, Mexico.
April 10-12, 2018, Tues.-Thurs. Rasch Conference: IOMW, New York, NY,
April 13-17, 2018, Fri.-Tues. AERA, New York, NY,
May 22 - 24, 2018, Tues.-Thur. EALTA 2018 pre-conference workshop (Introduction to Rasch measurement using WINSTEPS and FACETS, Thomas Eckes & Frank Weiss-Motz),
May 25 - June 22, 2018, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),
June 27 - 29, 2018, Wed.-Fri. Measurement at the Crossroads: History, philosophy and sociology of measurement, Paris, France.,
June 29 - July 27, 2018, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),
July 25 - July 27, 2018, Wed.-Fri. Pacific-Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS), (Preconference workshops July 23-24, 2018) Fudan University, Shanghai, China "Applying Rasch Measurement in Language Assessment and across the Human Sciences"
Aug. 10 - Sept. 7, 2018, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets),
Sept. 3 - 6, 2018, Mon.-Thurs. IMEKO World Congress, Belfast, Northern Ireland
Oct. 12 - Nov. 9, 2018, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),



Our current URL is

Winsteps® is a registered trademark

Concerned about aches, pains, youthfulness? Mike and Jenny suggest Liquid Biocell