Item discrimination or slope estimation
In Winsteps, item discrimination is not a parameter. It is merely a descriptive statistic.
Thoughts about item discrimination: Item discrimination and Rasch fit statistics are asymmetric. Noisy, unpredictable misfit (high mean-squares, large positive t-values, very low discrimination) degrade measurement. But too predictable overfit (low mean-squares, large negative, t-statistics, very high discrimination) do not degrade measurement. They merely cause standard errors to be estimated too low and reliabilities to be estimated too high - this is equivalent to the well-known "attenuation paradox" of CTT. So the useful range of discrimination is something like the range 0.5 to 2 or it could be 0.5 to infinity!! But when discrimination becomes very high (mean-squares very low), that usually means the items are malfunctioning in some way. Here is an informative paper on the topic of high item discrimination:
Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 1, 15, 1988. "Item Discrimination: When More Is Worse" by Geofferey N. Masters.
High item discrimination can be a symptom of a special kind of measurement disturbance introduced by an item that gives persons of high ability a special advantage over and above their higher abilities. This type of disturbance, which can be interpreted as a form o f item "bias," can be encouraged by methods that routinely interpret highly discriminating items as the "best" items on a test and may be compounded by procedures that weight items by their discrimination. The type of measurement disturbance described and illustrated in this paper occurs when an item is sensitive to individual differences on a second, undesired dimension that is positively correlated with the variable intended to be measured. Possible secondary influences of this type include opportunity to learn, opportunity to answer, and test-wiseness.
The Rasch model specifies that item discrimination, also called the item slope, be uniform across items. This supports additivity and construct stability. Winsteps estimates what the item discrimination parameter would have been if it had been parameterized. The Rasch slope is the average discrimination of all the items. It is not the mean of the individual slopes because discrimination parameters are non-linear. Mathematically, the average slope is set at 1.0 when the Rasch model is formulated in logits, or 1.70 when it is formulated in probits (as 2-PL and 3-PL usually are). 0.59 is the conversion from logits to probits.
The empirical discrimination is computed after first computing and anchoring the Rasch measures. In a post-hoc analysis, a discrimination parameter, ai, is estimated for each item. The estimation model is of the form:
This has the appearance of a 2-PL IRT or "Generalized Partial Credit" model, but differs because the discrimination or slope parameter is not used in the estimation of the other parameters. The reported values of item discrimination, DISCR, are a first approximation to the precise value of ai obtained from the Newton-Raphson estimation equation:
The possible range of ai is -∞ to +∞, where +∞ corresponds to a Guttman data pattern (perfect discrimination) and -∞ to a reversed Guttman pattern. Rasch estimation usually forces the average item discrimination to be near 1.0. Consequently an estimated discrimination of 1.0 accords with Rasch model expectations. Values greater than 1.0 indicate over-discrimination, and values less than 1.0 indicate under-discrimination. Over-discrimination is thought to be beneficial in many raw-score and IRT item analyses. High discrimination usually corresponds to low MNSQ values, and low discrimination with high MNSQ values.
From an informal simulation study, Edward Wolfe reports Winsteps discrimination to have a .88 correlation with the generating slope parameters for a 2-PL dataset. BILOG has a .95 correlation.
Table 29.1 allows you to estimate the empirical item discrimination, at least as well as a 2-PL IRT computer program. This is because 2-PL discrimination estimation is degraded by the imputation of a person distribution and constraints on discrimination values. It is also skewed by accidental outliers which your eye can disregard. When Discrimination=Yes. exact computation is done in the measure tables.
In Table 29.1 draw in the line that, to your eye, matches the central slope of the empirical item characteristic curve (ICC).
Estimate the logit distance from where the line intercepts the .0 score value to where it intercepts the 1.0 score value (for dichotomies). The logit distance here is about 4.0 logits.
Use the central logit measure to logit discrimination line in this nomogram to estimate discrimination. In this nomogram, a logit distance of 4.0 logits, corresponds to a logit discrimination of 1.0, in accordance with model prediction. Steeper slopes, i.e., higher discriminations, correspond to shorter distances.
Help for Winsteps Rasch Measurement Software: www.winsteps.com. Author: John Michael Linacre
For more information, contact email@example.com or use the Contact Form
|Facets Rasch measurement software.
Buy for $149. & site licenses.
Freeware student/evaluation download
Winsteps Rasch measurement software. Buy for $149. & site licenses. Freeware student/evaluation download
|State-of-the-art : single-user and site licenses : free student/evaluation versions : download immediately : instructional PDFs : user forum : assistance by email : bugs fixed fast : free update eligibility : backwards compatible : money back if not satisfied|
Rasch, Winsteps, Facets online Tutorials
|Forum||Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic|
Click here to add your email address to the Winsteps and Facets email list for notifications.
Click here to ask a question or make a suggestion about Winsteps and Facets software.
|Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online)||Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online)||Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch||Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox||Best Test Design, Wright & Stone|
|Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters||Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith||Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes||Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales: Rasch Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments, George Engelhard, Jr. & Stefanie Wind||Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green|
|Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar||Journal of Applied Measurement||Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich||Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson||Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale|
|in Spanish:||Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán||Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez|
|Winsteps Tutorials||Facets Tutorials||Rasch Discussion Groups|
|Coming Rasch-related Events|
|Jan. 5 - Feb. 2, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|Jan. 10-16, 2018, Wed.-Tues.||In-person workshop: Advanced Course in Rasch Measurement Theory and the application of RUMM2030, Perth, Australia (D. Andrich), Announcement|
|Jan. 17-19, 2018, Wed.-Fri.||Rasch Conference: Seventh International Conference on Probabilistic Models for Measurement, Matilda Bay Club, Perth, Australia, Website|
|Jan. 22-24, 2018, Mon-Wed.||In-person workshop: Rasch Measurement for Everybody en español (A. Tristan, Winsteps), San Luis Potosi, Mexico. www.ieia.com.mx|
|April 10-12, 2018, Tues.-Thurs.||Rasch Conference: IOMW, New York, NY, www.iomw.org|
|April 13-17, 2018, Fri.-Tues.||AERA, New York, NY, www.aera.net|
|May 22 - 24, 2018, Tues.-Thur.||EALTA 2018 pre-conference workshop (Introduction to Rasch measurement using WINSTEPS and FACETS, Thomas Eckes & Frank Weiss-Motz), https://ealta2018.testdaf.de|
|May 25 - June 22, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 27 - 29, 2018, Wed.-Fri.||Measurement at the Crossroads: History, philosophy and sociology of measurement, Paris, France., https://measurement2018.sciencesconf.org|
|June 29 - July 27, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|July 25 - July 27, 2018, Wed.-Fri.||Pacific-Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS), (Preconference workshops July 23-24, 2018) Fudan University, Shanghai, China "Applying Rasch Measurement in Language Assessment and across the Human Sciences" www.promsociety.org|
|Aug. 10 - Sept. 7, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com|
|Sept. 3 - 6, 2018, Mon.-Thurs.||IMEKO World Congress, Belfast, Northern Ireland www.imeko2018.org|
|Oct. 12 - Nov. 9, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
Our current URL is www.winsteps.com
Winsteps® is a registered trademark
|Concerned about aches, pains, youthfulness? Mike and Jenny suggest Liquid Biocell|